Sí, precisamente por eso la recuerdo: fue una masacre horrenda contra un poblado que no pinchaba ni cortaba.
1 me gusta
Ya renunció el gordito cameron?
La bolsa de tokio cae un 7% , estan corriendo como gato quemado
Es en serio?
---------- Mensaje unificado a las 05:09 ---------- El mensaje anterior habia sido a las 05:08 ----------
Han salido muchos partidos de oposición a ofrecerle respaldo. Y eso es lo mejor: Si renuncia sólo añadirá incertidumbre aun
Hasta luego y gracias por los pescados
2 Me gusta
Buena la referencia a Douglas Adams
1 me gusta
Y cual es el problema ? Hay casamientos que no funcionan…
1 me gusta
Quedan 5 centros.
Pero Panama era un estado independiente que se anexo a Gran Colombia voluntariamente, y después pretendían que no se seccionara. Las islas no son un Estado, los ingleses las invadieron. No son comparables.
Los únicos beneficiarios de olvidar las pretensiones, serían los ingleses.
Decile a ella, yo me estoy cagando de risa
2 Me gusta
se achica la diferencia… esperemos q no pase la gran “C5N”
abrite una cerveza ! yo tambien me estoy cagando de risa , jamas pense que iba a ver esto !
1 me gusta
Caída en los mercados bursátiles de Polonia.
---------- Mensaje unificado a las 05:20 ---------- El mensaje anterior habia sido a las 05:18 ----------
Panamá no era un estado independiente: Era un departamento de la Nueva Granada. Como Colombia le dio la concesión del canal a unos franceses, Roosevelt hizo un gran ajedrez internacional que culminó en la separación e independencia de Panamá, y la posterior construcción del canal por los estadounidenses.
Ustedes no ejercían soberanía en esas islas desde finales del siglo XIX si mal no estoy.
The negotiations
Cameron has vowed if there is a Brexit vote he will trigger article 50, the part of the Lisbon treaty that sets in train a two-year process whereby a member state can notify the EU council of its decision to leave.
Constitutionally, the triggering of article 50 is a decision for him alone, not parliament, since it is a matter of the royal prerogative. At the same time, nothing can stop parliament passing a motion that seeks to instruct him not to trigger article 50.
Cameron’s statement that he would trigger article 50 was in part made to dramatise the irreversibility of Brexit. This starts a two-year negotiation with the EU that must end with the UK’s ejection, unless the union unanimously agrees to extend the negotiations at the two years’ end.
The UK then formally leaves once a deal – which requires the support of the UK and a “qualified majority” of the remaining 27 member states (specifically, 20 of them, comprising at least 65% of their population) is struck.
If at the two years’ end neither a deal nor an extension has been agreed, the UK automatically reverts to World Trade Organisation rules, meaning the UK faces tariffs on all the goods it sells to the EU. So if the UK triggers article 50, Britain will have wilfully leapt on to a conveyor belt that ends with the EU holding all the bargaining chips. Even in spite or out of despair, it is doubtful Cameron would wish to step immediately on to such a conveyor belt.
The prime minister will be operating largely at the sufferance of the Brexit wing of his party. That wing is disunited to the point of dysfunction and will need time to absorb their unexpected victory. Some Brexiters have for months quietly pointed out the referendum is advisory and asks voters’ views only on whether to leave the EU. It is silent on the form of the departure. An Irish referendum, by contrast, posed very specific legal questions, giving clear instructions to the politicians.
Analysis The Norway option: what is it and what does it mean for Britain?
Some Eurosceptics advocate a Brexit and a Norway-style relationship with the EU. We look at six key questions about this model
Read more
So Brexiters will face a choice between maintaining their pledge to withdraw from the single market and so ending the free movement of people, or whether instead to seek what has been described as purgatory – the kind of half-in, half-out arrangement enjoyed by Norway.
Eurosceptic MEP Daniel Hannan has argued Brexit should be viewed as a process, not a single moment of departure, and a Norway arrangement for the UK might be a stepping off point before the final rupture in years to come.
If the Brexiters are too leisurely, the electorate may become impatient, the pro-EU Commons majority start to mobilise, and the vista of a new election, providing new political mandates, becomes more imminent. Hard Brexiters will be impatient.
The EU
In all these calculations, the UK parliament will not be the only actor. The EU, faced by centrifugal forces, will wish to act decisively, something it rarely does. One group may urge the EU to demand that the UK triggers article 50; a second group, possibly led by the Poles, may explore whether the terms of the negotiation between the EU and the UK could be reopened. Many diplomats privately believe the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, should have conceded more to Cameron on free movement.
But the majority EU view is likely to be that UK negotiations were finished in February, and that ship has sailed. The commission president, Jean-Claude Juncker, said before the vote: “Cameron got the maximum he could receive and we gave the maximum we could give. So there will be no renegotiation, not on the agreement we found in February, nor as far as any kind of treaty negotiations are concerned.”
The priority instead would be to prevent what has been described as the psychology of a bank run gripping the EU, as calls for parallel referenda proliferate in the Netherlands, France, Poland or Hungary. That, after all, has been the explicit goal of some leave campaigners. Michael Gove, for instance, called for the “liberation of Europe”. Once those demands grow, the whole EU project will slip from paralysis to disintegration.
Any divorce settlement would focus on mundane budgetary issues – pension liabilities, properties and other assets, and deal with budgetary questions. It would also cover the rights of EU nationals based in the UK and vice versa.
A key interim will be whether UK-based financial firms lose their EU “passport”, whereby firms registered in one member state are allowed to do business across the bloc without needing further authorisation.
Separately, the higher-stake trade talks will look at whether the UK rejoins the existing European free trade agreement or instead strikes outside on a free trade treaty of its own.
Beyond that, talks with the Irish government, the Commonwealth, Nato and innumerable other bodies await. The success of these complex negotiations will depend on the chemistry of the relationship between the UK and Europe post-Brexit, and whether the triumphalists or the pragmatists in the Brexit camp hold sway.
That in turn will depend on whether Cameron can restore relations with the two old friends that have laid him so low – Gove and Boris Johnson. After the events of the past two months, everyone knows they travel without maps.
No entiendo nada pero cualquier cosa que perjudique a los ingleses es una buena noticia para mi
Pero ustedes ya reconocieron al estado panameño. Nosotros nunca firmamos ningun tratado,
Partidos de extrema derecha Lega Nord y Front National, Italia y Francia, felicitan a Inglaterra y proponen llevar a cabo sus propios referendos.
Totalmente.A los suecos les está pasando que les está creciendo la extrema derecha nacionalista con el discurso anti refugiados xq tienen problemas para insertarlos. En un par de países ya son gobierno,como en Polonia y Hungría.En Austria están por ahí.A eso hay que sumarle el apoyo de Rusia a los nacionalismos de Europa del Este que intentan ‘‘salvar’’ a Europa del liberalismo y la homosexualidad mientras USA incentiva a los anti rusos como los países Bálticos,etc.
Un mundo con Putin,Trump y una Europa nacionalista en qué terminaría?
1 me gusta
[video=youtube_share;cBojbjoMttI]The Sex Pistols - Anarchy In The U.K (official video) - YouTube
Precisamente, se les reconoció luego que se aceptó que no iban a volver más. Y fue lo mejor para ambos.
El problema es que al no ejercer soberanía, y dejar que una isla se llene de extranjeros se interpreta como si estuvieras renunciando a ella. Y si las ignoras por casi 100 años, el asunto empeora.
---------- Mensaje unificado a las 05:30 ---------- El mensaje anterior habia sido a las 05:28 ----------
A mí me asusta más un mundo con Hillary, Putin y una Europa nacionalista.